Questions and answers

FAQ: Software development and digitalisation for SMEs

What can existing tools handle, what belongs in the contract, and who runs the solution afterwards? Answers before commissioning a project.

At a glance
  • Check existing features and extensions first; AI is optional.
  • Describe one initial workflow with sample data and expected results.
  • Explicitly agree data migration, recurring costs, access and responsibility for operations.

Questions and answers (11)

Do we have to replace our existing software?

Not necessarily. We first look at existing features, extensions and automation. Custom software is an option when an important gap remains. Our offering includes small internal tools, dashboards and integrations; these do not necessarily require replacing an entire system.

Does the solution have to include artificial intelligence?

No. Conventional software may be sufficient for fixed rules, calculations or transferring known data fields. AI can help summarise texts that use different wording, for example. Which results need a person to check them is agreed before implementation.

How do we define a small first version?

Choose one workflow, the users involved and the required outcome. Decide which features are essential now and which can wait. In a portal example, documents and approvals could be in the first scope while automatic reminders remain outside it. Additional features are agreed before implementation.

What does a requirement look like without a technical specification?

For example: “When a customer approves version 2 of a document, the person, time and version must remain visible. If version 3 is uploaded, it is not yet approved.” This fictional portal example names an action and a testable result. Add who may view or change information and what should happen when details are missing.

Which factors determine the cost?

Mainly features, integrations, data quality and user roles. Peak Pioneers provides a quote for the agreed initial scope; operations, licences and any maintenance are listed separately. When comparing standard and custom software, also compare introduction, data migration and recurring costs over the same period of use.

What determines the delivery schedule?

The agreed scope, available interfaces and data, and your feedback and approvals. Before commissioning, clarify who will provide test data, access and business decisions. These inputs support a project schedule; one standard completion time will not fit every project.

Can the solution connect to our ERP or CRM?

This depends on available interfaces, licences and permissions, which are checked before a firm commitment. Also clarify which system is authoritative for each set of data. The agreed integration needs to cover duplicate records, outages and necessary manual corrections.

What should we clarify about migrating existing data?

Identify the data and history you need and the formats available for export. A small sample can reveal missing fields, duplicate records and how data maps to the new application. Explicitly include cleaning, a trial import, verification and the switchover date in the agreed scope; data migration is not automatically included.

How do we check whether the application is ready for acceptance?

Agree sample scenarios and expected results before development. In the portal example: approve version 2, upload version 3 and check that only version 2 is marked as approved. Also check access permissions and important failure cases. Record open issues and how they will be addressed before acceptance.

Who handles operations and incidents after handover?

This is specified in the offer. Documentation and handover are part of the software offering; operations, maintenance and ongoing support are agreed as needed. Assign responsibility for hosting, updates, incidents and recovery, including your own team’s tasks. A development commission alone does not settle these responsibilities.

Which access, data and rights do we receive?

Have the offer specify the accounts, documentation, export options, usage rights and any source code to be handed over. Test an export with sample data if changing providers later matters to you. The agreed scope determines what you receive; “custom software” alone is not a blanket commitment about ownership or all rights.

Sources and technical background

These sources explain the underlying principles. Our recommendations provide practical guidance and do not promise a particular project result. Editorial review: 18 October 2026.

Which workflow would you like to simplify?

Describe your existing tools, one typical task and the desired outcome. This gives us a basis for discussing whether an existing feature, automation or a custom application fits.

Free initial conversation