Practical exampleOrder processing

Move orders from PDFs and Excel into your ERP – without entering them twice

An order arrives by email. Someone copies the details into Excel, clarifies missing information and passes the list on. A second person then enters the same data into the ERP.

What changes in everyday work

A shared digital record can replace this intermediate list: capture details once, resolve questions within the order and transfer the approved data to the ERP.

The business review remains. What can disappear is the repeated entry of details that have already been checked.

TodayIn the proposed workflow
Order details appear in the PDF, in Excel and later in the ERP.Details are prepared in a shared entry screen and then transferred.
Questions and corrections have to be brought together from emails and lists.Open questions, amendments and approval stay with the record.
After handover, it is not always clear whether the order was created.The ERP response shows whether the transfer succeeded.

An example: an order with a missing item number

The following details and screen are illustrative. They show a possible workflow, not a documented client project.

A customer orders twelve sealing rings in a PDF. The quantity and delivery address are provided, but the item number is missing. The description “sealing ring, 20 mm” is not enough to identify the exact item.

The order processing team opens a central entry screen. It shows the original document alongside the prepared fields. This extract shows a single order line:

Order awaiting review

Order reference
B-104
Customer
K-208
Item description
Sealing ring, 20 mm
Item number
To be clarified
Quantity
12 units
Delivery address
Musterweg 8, 8000 Zurich
Status
Clarification needed
Capture and compare
Details can be entered manually or suggested from the PDF. They are checked against the original before approval.
Clarify the missing item number
The missing item number stops the handover. The responsible person asks the customer, who confirms item DR-20-A. They check the number against the item master and add it directly to the record.
Approve and transfer
After checking the customer, item, quantity and address, they approve the record. The integration transfers the agreed fields to the ERP. This requires a suitable interface that returns a confirmation.
Confirmation on the record
Transferred · ERP order A-7021 Only the ERP confirmation sets this status. It confirms that the order was recorded; it does not constitute a delivery commitment.

Where the work actually decreases

The question about the item would also have been necessary in the previous workflow. The difference is what happens next:

Add the detail once

The confirmed item number is added to the record that will be used for the next steps.

Transfer checked details

The operations team no longer has to type the corrected Excel row into the ERP.

See the processing status

Open questions and approval are visible on the record.

Trace the transfer

The ERP confirmation can be linked to the original incoming order.

When the change is worthwhile

Whether the change is worthwhile depends on the total effort. This includes checking extracted details, handling exceptions and maintaining the integration.

A comparison therefore needs to cover actual data entry steps, processing time and the effort spent on corrections.

Does this need AI or a new application?

Fixed rules can handle required fields, quantity checks, approval and data transfer. AI can help extract details from documents with varying layouts. Its suggestions must remain verifiable.

An additional application is not always necessary either. If your ERP already has a suitable entry screen or import function, that route should be checked first.

The screen shown here describes the function needed. Whether it sits in the ERP, an existing tool or a supplementary application depends on your systems.

For a small number of orders, entering them manually straight into the ERP may already be the right solution.

What happens when the transfer status is unclear?

If the connection breaks after sending, the record remains marked “Transfer status unclear”. Before trying again, it is necessary to check whether the ERP has already created the order.

An order received again is also checked against existing records. This helps establish whether it is an amendment or a duplicate submission.

How Peak Pioneers supports you

The starting point is a real order from your everyday work. Together, we look at where details are captured, corrected, approved and entered again.

We agree the scope of any implementation and subsequent support based on this workflow.

What we clarify together
  • Which functions in your existing software already cover the workflow?
  • Which fields need to be transferred between systems?
  • Which checks and approvals are required?
  • Would configuration, an integration or a supplementary application be appropriate?

Sources and technical background

These sources explain the underlying principles. Our recommendations provide practical guidance and do not promise a particular project result. Editorial review: 18 October 2026.

Questions about this example

How should I understand this example?

This is an illustrative workflow. We have implemented comparable tasks in some internal or external projects. The presentation is deliberately simplified; confidential client and business information is not published. The example describes a possible approach and is not attributed to a specific client project.

Does this workflow need artificial intelligence?

No. Required-field checks, master-data matching and data transfer can use fixed rules. AI is an optional aid for preparing unstructured incoming documents. A form or suitable ERP import may already be enough.

Where do you enter the same order details more than once?

Bring an anonymised sample document and the names of the systems involved. We can use these to assess together which step could be simplified and what it would require.

Discuss your order workflow